"What is it that keeps the country down", asked the speaker. A young
man in the audience replied unhesitatingly: "Undoubtedly the institution
of caste that kept the majority low castes and the society backward" and
added "it continues".
The speaker replied, "May be".
But, pausing for a moment, he added, "May not be". Shocked, the young
man angrily asked him to explain his "may-not-be" theory.
The
speaker calmly mentioned just one fact that clinched the debate. He said, "Before
the British rule in India, over two-thirds - yes, two-thirds - of the Indian kings
belonged to what is today known as the Other Backward Castes (OBCs).
"It is the British," he said, "who robbed the OBCs - the ruling
class running all socio-economic institutions - of their power, wealth and status."
So it was not the upper caste which usurped the OBCs of their due position in
the society?
The speaker’s assertion that it was not so was founded
on his study - unbelievably painstaking study for years and decades in the archives
in India, England and Germany. He could not be maligned as a ‘saffron’
ideologue and what he said could not be dismissed thus. He was Dharampal, a Gandhian
in ceaseless search of truth like his preceptor Gandhi himself was, but a Gandhian
with a difference. He ran no ashram on state aid to do ‘Gandhigiri’.
Admitting that "he and those like him do not know much about our own
society", the young man who questioned Dharampal - Banwari is his name -
became his student. By meticulous research of the British sources over decades,
Dharampal demolished the myth that India was backward educationally or economically
when the British entered. Citing the Christian missionary William Adam’s
report on indigenous education in Bengal and Bihar in 1835 and 1838, Dharampal
established that at that time there were 100,000 schools in Bengal, one school
for about 500 boys; that the indigenous medical system that included inoculation
against small-pox.
He also proved by reference to other materials that
Adam’s record was ‘no legend’. He relied on Sir Thomas Munroe’s
report to the Governor at about the same time to prove similar statistics about
schools in Madras. He also found that the education system in the Punjab during
the Maharaja Ranjit Singh’s rule was equally extensive. He estimated that
the literary rate in India before the British was higher than that in England.
Citing British public records he established, on the contrary, that ‘British
had no tradition of education or scholarship or philosophy from 16th to early
18th century, despite Shakespeare, Bacon, Milton, Newton, etc’. Till then
education and scholarship in the UK was limited to select elite. He cited Alexander
Walker’s Note on Indian education to assert that it was the monitorial system
of education borrowed from India that helped Britain to improve, in later years,
school attendance which was just 40, 000, yes just that, in 1792. He then compared
the educated people’s levels in India and England around 1800. The population
of Madras Presidency then was 125 lakhs and that of England in 1811 was 95 lakhs.
Dharampal found that during 1822-25 the number of those in ordinary schools in
Madras Presidency was around 1.5 lakhs and this was after great decay under a
century of British intervention.
As against this, the number attending
schools in England was half - yes just half - of Madras Presidency’s, namely
a mere 75,000. And here to with more than half of it attending only Sunday schools
for 2-3 hours! Dharampal also established that in Britain ‘elementary system
of education at people’s level remained unknown commodity’ till about
1800! Again he exploded the popularly held belief that most of those attending
schools must have belonged to the upper castes particularly Brahmins and, again
with reference to the British records, proved that the truth was the other way
round.
During 1822-25 the share of the Brahmin students in the indigenous
schools in Tamil-speaking areas accounted for 13 per cent in South Arcot to some
23 per cent in Madras while the backward castes accounted for 70 per cent in Salem
and Tirunelveli and 84 per cent in South Arcot.
The situation was almost
similar in Malayalam, Oriya and Kannada-speaking areas, with the backward castes
dominating the schools in absolute numbers. Only in the Telugu-speaking areas
the share of the Brahmins was higher and varied from 24 to 46 per cent. Dharampal’s
work proved Mahatma Gandhi’s statement at Chatham House in London on October
20, 1931 that "India today is more illiterate than it was fifty or hundred
years ago" completely right.
Not many know of Dharampal or of his
work because they have still not heard of the Indian past he had discovered. After,
long after, Dharampal had established that pre-British India was not backward
a Harvard University Research in the year 2005 (India’s Deindustrialisation
in the 18th and 19th Centuries by David Clingingsmith and Jeffrey G Williamson)
among others affirmed that "while India produced about 25 percent of world
industrial output in 1750, this figure had fallen to only 2 percent by 1900."
The Harvard University Economic Research also established that the Industrial
employment in India also declined from about 30 to 8.5 per cent between 1809-13
and 1900, thus turning the Indian society backward.
PS: This great warrior
who established the truth - the truth that was least known - that India was not
backward when the British came, but became backward only after they came, is no
more. He passed away two weeks ago on October 26, 2006, at Sevagram at Warda.